That
email started like this, "... reminds me again of how hard children
in the developing world, especially China and India but Malaysia too, aspire to
have what Americans would consider a living wage. I end up teaching the cream
of the crop of these students. Outside of the foreign children I teach I also
teach the children of people who for one reason or another are ahead of the
curve for their country and are straining for more. Sometimes students on
scholarship or students whose parents have scrimped every penny and placed
their odds on their kids cross my path and I can't help but to reflect how
different American students are. I loved the kids I had in the US, don't get me
wrong. I had a lot of hard working kids in the US as well, but it doesn't matter in a comparable sense.
The world's playing field is becoming more even. All people of the world are
reaching a higher standard of living (though not unilaterally), but standards of
living in the US will slow down dramatically as students from places like
China, where kids study for 12 hours a day or more, are filling the positions
that global demand is asking for."
In some
ways I worry about these kids who constantly study. Its an arms race and I see
how the anxiety of their parent’s hopes and efforts hang on them. To their parents
it is especially important for them to make it because the parents have nothing
or little for them to fall back on in terms of a comparable future prospect.
The most difficult aspect for most families in the most quickly developing
countries is how the inequality is causing mobility to become even harder.
There was a time when hard work paid off in folds for the effort put forth, but that window is slowly closing.
Those at the top are not in fact the best and brightest, they are just the
richest who are trained hard to be the best and brightest. They benefit from the Great Gatsby curve. Some will make it though, and those parent's who scrimp and toil for their children are the ones who hope and pray for that day. Likely I will one day be one of them, though probably not as much scrimping and toiling, though just as much hoping.
I started
thinking about this email again because I had a holiday recently and while
traveling around I was lugging a book that a student had given me. This book I
had seen before while perusing economic books, but I didn't actually get it
into my hands until one of my clever IB students and I were having a discussion
about income inequality and he suggested that he would loan me Plutocrats. Knowing that I
had a break coming up and would need reading material I asked him to borrow it.
It turned out to be very interesting indeed. In general the book looks at the
income gap between the richest and poorest in America, but also examines income
inequality overtime in the US and makes connections to the larger world. Some
of the more interesting parts of the book for me were the descriptions of the
income gaps between those in the top 1% and those in the top .01% of Americans.
It is enormous. I was also taken with the idea that today’s super wealthy are
largely not the leisurely plutocrats of old, but seem to be a newer breed
of working plutocrat. The percentage of high income earners has
gone up and inversely the percentage of high income receivers has
gone down. In other words, the super rich are working more than ever to be
super rich. All that was very interesting, but what really hooked me in were
descriptions of the new elite’s children and the expectations of future
generations of the super rich. The descriptions of where and how these kids are
growing up hit especially near for me. Many of the super rich kids, sometimes
known as princelings, were all around me. Though I have rarely seen a child who comes from a home in which they move from gated community to school to home again in the comfort of air condition and tinted windows, I have come close. I can't point to one student I have ever had that I would point to with malice in saying that they were undeserving. Luckily, most of the kids have been very polite and hard working in the schools where I have been. Not so much the children of aristocracy, but the children of the new elite. Then again, I might have Kim Jung-Un in the classroom and never know it.
The
school I am at now has an annual fee of around 15 to 20,000USD. This private
international school has some of the best students I have ever taught, but it’s
no wonder. Every day when school lets out a parade of Mercedes Benz, BMW’s,
Jaguars, etc. come through the school gates to pick up kids. These kids are
largely from somewhere else, know more than two languages, have the means to
travel, and will likely all get into top schools.
The same
student who lent me the book then sent me the link to this post the
other day. Again, I found it especially interesting because this brought it
even closer while keeping it in the same context. These children are becoming a
society onto themselves. They belong everywhere and nowhere. They are multi-cultured
and no culture. This is something new in our times. There have always been the
children of the wealthy, but now there are the international children of the
wealthy and they will be the ones to guide China, India, Malaysia, Thailand,
etc. where much of the growth in the next 25 years is predicted to occur. The
children I have in my classrooms today will be the economic leaders of tomorrow
in a very real sense.
I
couldn’t help but to wonder what, being a princeling, this student thought
about all of this. Today in class I thanked him for the article, talked about
the book, and then as we were parting I said, “What is your take on all of
this?” as I gestured to his classmates and the school. He just said, “Well, I don’t really
know, you know? I only came last year, before that I was in local school.” And
there, is one who made it.

No comments:
Post a Comment