During my Sunday morning perusal of the NYTimes I came across this
article about the marriage market in China which was especially intriguing to me. When I lived in
Shanghai there was a marriage market in the city’s central park and perspective
parents and match makers would meet to post and chat about their charges. I had
heard of the increasingly desperate plight of the poorer urban and even poorer
rural male, but this article points to a whole new market in which brides are
hunted in plain sight. Scouts are deployed, databases are kept, and huge
bonuses worth a year or two in salary are paid to those who find the right
girl. This is no dating service however, the top clients pay 50,000 to 1.5 million USD for a
match. As the love hunter put it, “Why shouldn't they pay more to find the perfect
wife? This is the most important investment in their lives.”
One of the major issues in the book is the price of
girls/marriage. The traditional dowry and all the social implications that go
with it can clearly be explained by economics and pricing. More or less, people
had to pay to get rid of their daughters. Historically and currently in China
males have been preferred to females as they extended the family line and are caretakers
for parents in their old age. Some have gone as far as to say that women were
maids/slaves for their spouse’s family. Definitely not a desirable position.
The desire for sons has not changed and in fact has gotten quite
a bit more extreme since the introduction of ultrasounds and other devices
detecting sex before birth. At its peak in 2004 the sex ratio was about 121
boys to every 100 girls at birth. This is way out of sync with nature and has
produced (or not produced) what many have coined as “missing girls”. Estimates differ, but there
are expected to be about 25 million unmarried men by the end of the decade. The
sex ratio gap has narrowed in recent years and is
now 118 to every 100, but that is still the world’s widest chasm.
As this gap has continued and as China’s economy keeps on pace, more
and more poorer men have to remain bachelors as young women are snatched up by
those who can afford them. For women the choice is an obvious one. Love or not,
men with greater financial power give them and their offspring a better chance
of survival and continuing the line. Many factors have contributed to the changing valuation of women, but none so much as the imbalance in the market.
Most interesting of all is not the left over men at the age of 35
or 40 trying to find a match, but the women on the flip side of the coin. Those
who have had successful careers, but failed to marry and find it
increasingly hard as men do not desire women whose education or wealth are
larger than their own. This to me seems in-congruent with what prices
would signal. Why would a man, especially one who may also be a “leftover” be
averse to marrying a woman who is of higher financial and educational ranking
than he? Yes, there may be some pride or social conditioning there, but prices
should change that. However, that does not seem to be occurring as much as I
would expect. In one instance the article noted a pensioner, “who was seeking a
husband for his eldest daughter, a 36-year-old economics professor in Beijing.”
It would seem that there is an over abundance of smart successful Chinese women
just waiting for someone decent to agree to marry them. Any single economists
out there wishing to benefit from this disequilibrium?

I know a few female economics professors in Beijing...name?
ReplyDeleteFor all the chest-beating about dowry, in Turkey and many other places in the world (including China according to wikipedia), paying for the bride is a tradition. It looks like in many places both dowry and bride price exist. The net price of a bride can be either negative or positive, depending on the situation.
I doubt that desire for male children increased after ultrasounds became available. The ultrasounds just provided the ability to do something about it without actually killing an infant.
Prices should actually moderate the desire for sons -- if there are few women, I can expect my daughter to marry well/make me a ton of money.
I don't think it has changed, but gotten extreme in that the lengths people have gone to ensuring a son has obviously expanded. I agree, prices should moderate the desire for sons, but it does not seem to be occurring yet indicating that it is not yet worth it to let go of that social more. I actually think this could be a point of civil strife in the future as more and more men will reluctantly remain single. Single men are dangerous.
ReplyDelete